Conclusions 

Science is objective, neutral and independent. 
Science is provable and verifiable. 
Science searches for the truth.

Neutrality:

As You can see the founder of Biblical Archeology - who claimed as proved a time for the Exodus over 300 years later than the Bible states - has been disproved through the missing of any essential evidence for this time. However instead of clarifying that the falsified biblical chronology had been disproved - from then on up until today leading Biblical Archeologists and Egyptologists fixed the by Jericho disproved Ramesses Time Hypothesis as an undisputable Paradigm in order to 

a) misuse it for claiming to have disproved the Bible 

b) surpress further research in any correct biblical times 

c) silence resulting new discussions about the most passionately rejected or supported ancient source in history - the Bible. 

This worldwide accepted paradox logic has grown up into even more chaotic and complex behavioral patterns. On the openly antibiblical and the same time self-acclaimed neutral scientific side not just all the biblical historicity confirming ancient writings were redefined as per se inadmissible sources; Even Bible corroborating archeological evidence of the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History like the Ahmose Storm Stela and the Iypuwer Papyrus has been devaluated into historically irrelevant symbolistic poetry through.
On the probiblical side we have mainly the 13th century and the 15th century Exodus lobby: Both of them are ignoring and changing a large amount of biblical time data. Both grew up on the fundament of beginning Biblical Archeology: The biblical time data essentially falsifying and ignoring Ramesses Time Paradigm. Thus they are imprinted by the up until today ruling prejudice of a more or less untrustworthiness of the biblical content and time data. For example members of the 15th century Exodus dating lobby invested in an investigative project trying to disprove the Radio Carbon Results confirming the strictly biblical time ('1620-1600' BC) of the Ten Plagues causing Santorini Eruption. Finally they were not able to disprove them. The Radio Carbon Results of the Santorini Eruption impacts on Egypt together with the Strict Bible Chronology enforce the correction of the official Chronology of the Second Intermediate Period/ the elimination of about 75 non-existing non evidenced years in the Egyptian Chronology. The Early Exodus Dating Lobby supported examination team tried to throw as many doubts as possible onto the radiocarbon result in order to reconfirm theit Early Date Theory for the Exodus (1). That way specific pro-biblical paradigms followers help leading adversaries against the trustworthiness of the Bible by creating even more contradictoriness, chaos, and confusion. As a matter if fact this kind of contradictoriness finally turns out to be the fundament of the History of Biblical Archeology from its very beginning on.

Neutrality.

Independence: This work may be most challenging for nearly all believers who earn their income by somehow archeologically proving the Bible. Nearly all of them are fully integrated into lobby groups who defend one or another certain dating theory ignoring or changing biblical time data and they can lose their complete built-up reputation, respect, or even income if they give up their favorite dating theory and turn back to the Word. They have to take into consideration that no court on earth only takes jury members that promise not to take a self-claimed eye-witness report "literally" in order to find out the truth. And if You've really once read completely through the entire Bible You know for sure that it claims to be a sum of eye-whiteness reports and nothing else, confirmed by Moses and the Prophets and for the Christians even by Jesus himself. So after having studied this work You are able to realize that in fact no single sentence of the Bible about Israel in Egypt ever has been disproved at all. And now it's up to the reading Late or Early Dating devotee if he decides to stop "proving" the Word by allegedly "disproving" the Word at other places in the Bible like eg. "some" biblical to be ignored or changed time data - only because everybody in this field has been doing this throughout the history of Biblical Archeology from the very beginning on. Because he is able to realize now that he is then indirectly just one of all the 'Albrights' who enabled all the 'Finkelsteins' to take over the rulership of the scenery and that he has then just become one of all the unintended ‘stirrup holders’ and ‚red carpet layers‘ for all the leading Adversaries of the Word and their achieved worldwide fallaway from faith and the name of the stirrup or carpet is Bible Falsification. Please see in that regardless of any new evidence you will never gain the acceptance of Leading “Biblical“ Archeology and Egyptology because they have become antibiblical Pseudosciences. Bible Forgers proving the Bible is a paradoxon and cannot be HIS will because falsification is the role of HIS adversary who was liar from the beginning - but the TRUTH will set You free (John8:32.44). As already revealed at the very beginning of this work biblical 594 years between King Salomos 4th reign year of building the Temple and the Exodus as the exact sum of all time figures in 2Kings2:11, 2Chron9:30, Judges3:8, 3:11, 3:14, 3:30, 4:3, 5:31, 6:1, 8:28, 9:22, 10:2, 10:3, 10:8, 12:7, 12:9, 12:11, 12:14, 13:1, 1Samuel4:18, 7:2, Judges11:26, Numbers21, Joshua14:7-10, Numbers9:1 and Acts13:18 together do by no means contradict the famous 480 years of theocracy in 1Kings6:1; The g'dless 114 years of foreign rule in the Bible's Book of Judges turn out to be exactly the 114 years omitted in the 480 years of 1Kings6:1 to add up to the biblical evidenced sum of 594 years. Nearly all ancient relating writers evidenced knew this back then. Since half a millennium half of christianity was lead into falling away from half of its original faith by the method of picking out single Bible verses and for religious political ideological reasons changing their meaning so that the many other contradicting Bible verses have to be discarded or ignored up until today. You are called to escape out of the biggest scandal in the History of Science. Leave their false paradigms behind and finally start really digging for the truth instead of for falsified Bible Chronologies. Because you will never and can not win 'their game'!

Independence.

Neutrality: It is 'their game' of „proved neutrality" - through built in - by this complete work unveiled as - unproven anti-biblical paradigms in psychological reflection hypotheses, in the textual, source, form, literary, redactional, rhetorical, canonical, or narrative criticism, the historical-critical method, and last but not least the documentary hypothesis; Umberto Cassuto, also known as Moshe David Cassuto as Jewish Italian historian and biblical scholar of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem disproved the documentary hypothesis: According to Cassuto, each of the five pillars of the documentary hypothesis crumbles to dust when approached more closely and touched (The Documentary Hypothesis and the Composition of the Pentateuch. Umberto Cassuto, Joshua Berman, Israel Abrahams. Shalem Press, 2006, p. 49). Biblical Scholar Peter Gentry confirms this theory being a disproved fundamentalistic dogma dominating Leading antibiblical „Biblical Archeology“ and having occupied the Zeitgeist of Theology. Nearly all the mentioned methods had been exclusively invented as attempts to finally "disprove" one single selected ancient source - the Bible - evidenced not disprovable with all the original serious scientific analysis methods; They all have been exclusively invented in adversary against the credibility of the Bible and are thus by no means any neutral or objective. 

As already explained in this work the reader can investigate both sides of Biblical Archeological, not only the probiblical one but also the leading antibiblical one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck4ZJFXYzaM.
80% of the fundament of Israel Finkelstein's "disproval" of the historicity of the stories of the Patriarchs, of the Exodus and of the Conquest of Canaan are recited and self-created highly speculative antibiblical psychological reflection hypotheses proving nothing at all; Finkelstein claims the biblical history of the second millennium BC is mirroring the biblical history of the first millennium BC and thus is a compendium of political lies to justify actual politics. He is only focussing on similarities and is dropping the differences and then draws unreasonable connections. You can make anything work by cherry-picking correlations and then assuming there must be a causal link. But correlation is not causation. The point is You can meet parallels in everything if that is what You’re looking for. The only archeological „evidence“ delivered by him is the missing! of yet non-discovered four millenia old bones of camels in the Sinai desert from eg. the biblical time of Joseph's enslavement. The collapse of the walls of Jericho and its destruction by fire in the strictly biblically matching time around 1550 BC (see the end of the Chronology in Chapter Chronology) is as a matter of fact disproving the Bible Forgers' Ramesses Time Dogma but it is infamously misused to claim the Bible would have been allegedly disproved. And that has paradoxically turned out to be sufficient evidence to make most of the world believe the Bible is nothing more than a myth up until today. The missing evidence of camel bones in a small southern region of Israel says nothing about anywhere else in Israel, particularly the areas where the Bible claims the patriarchs had camels; Abraham, Jacob and Joseph’s enslavers did not get their camels from Canaan but from Syria, Mesopotamia, and Egypt, where domesticated camels are well-attested.

(Bryant Wood, “Camels in Genesis are Right Where They Belong,” Associates for Biblical Research, March 15, 2022). Like after his „Jericho revelation“ Finkelstein‘s dubious higly speculative antibiblical wicked delusory hypotheses gave rise to a number of hysterical headlines claiming the Bible had been disproved once and for all. It is indisputably obvious that to achieve the world’s historical fame to be the one who disproved the Bible is the passionate life goal of Israel Finkelstein and he is existentially dependant on the maintenance of his deceptions. These „arguments from silence“ can be destroyed by a single discovery as You can see in this work. The Associates of Biblical Research in their Youtube Digging for Truth Episode 141 additionally debunk Israel Finkelstein’s  desinformation regarding Camel Bones in the Near East supported by Donald Redford‘s claim Camels do not appear as domestic biests of burden until the 9th century BC. This is easily disproved by archeological evidence:

a) Petroglyphs of the late 3rd or early 2nd Mill BC depict a man together with his camel

b) A Bactrian Camel statue of the same time depicts a Camel with a harness.

c) Titus Kennedy delivers a list of a huge variety of archeological evidence disproving that antibiblical hypothesis.

As if these facettes of adversary against the Word would not cause enough complexity and confusion yet, there are even more and more antibiblical and antichristian paradigms taking over the rulership step by step in the relating Sciences, in Academic Christianity and Judaism and finally in the common world's mind ...

Constructivism: The existence of THE truth is being abolished. Today the number of different - even opposite - 'truths' is dependant on the number of the different perspectives and opinions which prevail or not. Even to claim to search for THE truth can make You suspicious in the modernistic 'Sciences', because it already sounds too "fundamentalistic" and thus not "objective". The original sense and core task of a Science to find out THE truth becomes an object of relativization: It is replaced by constructivist antibiblical methods and paradigms changing with time, fashion, and the actual ruling Zeitgeist. Examples of the resulting confusion ruling the scenery are several debates initiated by "Early Exodus Daters" and founders of biblical archeology forum groups in the web where I started to post results of my work: The very first accusation often made was that I would try to date the time of Israel in Egypt into a century where I have discovered anything interesting with some attributes reminding me of eg. biblical Joseph: This is an accusation they are themselves confronted with by anti-biblical and pro-biblical "Late Exodus Daters" who the same way ignore and falsify relevant biblical time data in order to their dating theory fit somehow. This accusation is psychologically called projection and does show in how far constructivism does already rule the scenery: It's not about finding out the truth anymore - it is about defending or attacking different dating lobbyism with no matter if true arguments as long as they are formulated by any "objective, scientific" method and as long as they don't challenge actual ruling antibiblical Zeitgeist paradigms in the field. Denying to firstly check deeply the first and only unfalsified Strict Bible Chronology before insisting on biased accusations was a second remarkable reaction. Denying to first examine and prove my entire Bible confirming archeological evidence before disputing it was the third remarkable debating behavior. This is a cultural phenomenon between all biblical time data ignoring and falsifying lobby groups in "Biblical" Archeology and You can imagine how much learning and progress takes place between these controversial groups in this scenery: It more reminds to the amount of inter-confessional learning between different Jewish or Christian confessional groups than to any scientific interdisciplinary exchange and learning of today. A thick Veil of Confusion is ruling these 'Sciences' and since the beginning of History of Biblical Archeology, as matter of fact, nobody in the field took all biblical time figures and all ancient relating writings serious enough to rediscover the only unfalsified millennia-old Strict Bible Chronology and unveil its tremendous amount of confirming archeological evidence: The Zeitgeist has not been allowing since over a century now to take these ancient sources as serious as necessary to find Israel in Egypt and Leading "Biblical" Archeology and Egyptology has always been a slave of the transitory current ruling Zeitgeist (1Corintians2:12).

Constructivism.

Artificial Pseudo-Dualismus: Another Zeitgeist phenomenon is the increasing of Dualistic thinking. Dualistic thinking can force You to make a decision between two pseudo-contradicting options and to believe one is true and the other is not. The Biblical criticism with its methods constructed by external antichristian adversaries of the Bible has successfully found its way into Christianity. "This is only meant symbolically": One example for pseudo-dualisms is enforcing a belief decision between the belief that something really happened what the Bible says and the belief that it has a symbolic meaning revealing a deeper truth. This pseudo-either-or thinking construct misleads into an increasing fall away from faith regarding more and more biblical occurrences because every biblical occurrence bears also a deeper symbolic meaning and truth in it. Examples are modern Zeitgeist belief statements like "Whether it is true if it happened or not, it stays to be true for me. So it doesn't matter if anything in the Bible really happened." or "My faith is stronger, it is independent of any historicity of biblical stories." or "If a faith is dependant on if a biblical occurrence really happened then it is a weak faith - A strong faith is independent of this question." or "Believing any miracle in the Bible having really happened as described is a children's faith. Grown-up faith is only centered in the deeper symbolic truth and independent of the question if anything really happened." This would lead to the conclusion that the martyrs in the first centuries died for a childish naive weak false faith or that these martyrs had secretely today's modern Zeitgeist "grown-up" faith only believing in deeper symbolic meanings but not in the scriptures as trustworthy eyewitness reports of things that really happened. The reader will easily realize that this modernistic kind of belief in the first centuries or in the last time gives an ideal excuse for sacrificing as a Christian in front of a ruler or wearing his mark confirming him as a g'd because this sacrifice or mark would have no real symbolic truth for him and only his belief in deeper inner symbolic meanings does matter. You see these pseudo-dualistic belief decisions totally destroy a faith You would risk Your life for. It wouldn't count anymore if MOSES or our Lord really once said or even did do anything that the Bible tells us - what matters only is meanwhile its inner deeper symbolic truth. Artificial Pseudo-Dualisms as a modern Zeitgeist phenomenon is creeping deeply into modern Christianity and has become a strong driver of falling away from the faith for mankind at the end of time. This development is nothing less than the modern Zeitgeist-driven theological reaction on all 'scientific' Bible "disproving" hypothesizes of the last generations. Antibiblical Archeologists and Egyptologists know and certainly welcome this development and use it for their devaluation of pro-biblical Archeologists: "The Bible is like the story of the Little Prince - a fairy tale with deep important truths in it. It never was meant as a book of historical eyewitnessed events. Instead, it always was solely meant as a book of "Faith" (meant as superstition). The belief that the stories of the Book of Exodus really happened is a childhood imprinted wish belief and was never meant to be understood that way." On the same site Leading "Biblical" Archeologists claim to have proved the Jewish Bible being mainly a compendium of political lies written one complete millennium later than it claims; These obvious paradox contradictions are no problem for Egyptologists or Antibiblical Archeologists, they easily co-exist.

Artificial Pseudo-Dualisms.

The author could go on and on this way but the readers will have realized now what is going on in this field.